10 Mistakes You Should Avoid When Answering Product Design Questions in PM Interviews (With Example)

Product Design questions are a cornerstone of Product Management interviews at companies like Google, Meta, and Amazon. They test your ability to think strategically, solve user pain points, prioritize features, and create impactful products. However, even strong candidates can make missteps that weaken their answers.

When I help candidates practice these questions, these are the most common mistakes. Here is how to avoid those mistakes and what to do instead.

Example Product Design Question:

"Design a product to help remote workers stay productive."

1. Jumping to Solutions Too Quickly

The Mistake:

Candidates often feel pressured to impress, so they dive straight into solution ideas: “Let’s build a time-tracking app with focus timers and analytics dashboards.”

Why It’s a Problem:

This approach skips the foundational step of clarifying the problem. It leaves the interviewer wondering if the solution is aligned with the real needs of remote workers.

What to do Instead:

Start by asking clarifying questions:

• “What kind of remote workers are we targeting? Freelancers, corporate employees, or entrepreneurs?”

• “Are there specific industries or roles we are focusing on?”

This shows the interviewer that you are thinking critically about the context before proposing solutions.

2. Not Defining the Target User Clearly

The Mistake:

A generic solution like “an app for all remote workers” won’t resonate. Trying to design for everyone often results in vague, unfocused answers.

What to do Instead:

Refine the user group:

• Example: “Let’s focus on software engineers working remotely for large tech companies. Their main challenge is staying productive with constant distractions at home and coordinating with distributed teams.”

This sharpens your answer, making it easier to design a product that truly meets their needs.

3. Skipping Problem Validation

The Mistake:

Jumping to feature brainstorming without confirming pain points can lead to irrelevant solutions.

What to do Instead:

Discuss potential user pain points:

• “From conversations with remote engineers, common challenges include fragmented communication, lack of focus, and difficulty maintaining a work-life balance.”

This step grounds your solution in real-world problems, showing you understand the importance of research.

4. Overcomplicating the Solution

The Mistake:

Candidates may suggest complex products with too many features: “A productivity suite with AI-driven to-do lists, video conferencing, and virtual reality workspaces.”

Why It’s a Problem:

Overcomplicating can dilute the value of the core product and make it unrealistic to execute.

What to do Instead:

Focus on an MVP (Minimum Viable Product):

• “The first version will focus on a simple distraction blocker with a Pomodoro timer and Slack integration to minimize disruptions.”

This keeps the solution practical and achievable, which interviewers appreciate.

5. Ignoring Trade-offs and Constraints

The Mistake:

Offering an idealistic solution without addressing constraints makes the answer seem disconnected from real-world execution.

What to do Instead:

Acknowledge trade-offs:

• “While a fully automated productivity tracker could be ideal, it might raise privacy concerns and require significant engineering effort. So for the MVP, we’ll focus on manual input to balance privacy and speed of development.”

Demonstrating that you balance trade-offs shows strategic thinking.

6. Failing to Define Success Metrics

The Mistake:

Skipping metrics leaves your answer incomplete.

What to do Instead:

Explain how you will measure success:

• “We’ll track metrics like time spent in focus mode, daily active users, and user satisfaction scores through surveys.”

This shows the interviewer that you understand the importance of measuring impact.

7. Neglecting the Competitive Landscape

The Mistake:

Ignoring existing solutions like Notion, Trello, or Toggl makes your answer seem less informed.

What to do Instead:

Briefly mention competitors:

• “Our product will differentiate by focusing on deep Slack integration and reward mechanisms to build positive habits—areas where existing tools fall short.”

This shows that you’ve done your homework and are thinking about market positioning.

8. Overlooking the User Experience (UX)

The Mistake:

Focusing only on features without considering how users will interact with the product can result in a disjointed answer.

What to do Instead:

Walk through the user journey:

• “The user opens the app, sets a work session (e.g., 25 minutes), and activates ‘Do Not Disturb’ on Slack. If they complete four sessions, they earn points toward a personal reward.”

This adds depth to your answer, showing that you care about how the product feels to the user.

9. Not Adapting to Follow-up Questions

The Mistake:

Sticking rigidly to your original idea when the interviewer presents a new constraint: “What if the product needs to support both engineers and marketing teams?”

What to do Instead:

Stay flexible and adapt:

• “That’s a great point. We could introduce custom modes for different roles—for example, engineers get focus timers, while marketers get task lists with deadlines.”

This shows you can pivot based on feedback—just like a real PM would in the product development process.

10. Overlooking Collaboration and Stakeholders

The Mistake:

Focusing only on the product without mentioning stakeholders gives the impression you don’t understand the collaborative nature of product development.

What to do Instead:

Mention collaboration:

• “We’ll partner with UX designers to ensure an intuitive experience, engineers for smooth Slack integration, and legal to handle privacy concerns.”

This demonstrates that you understand the importance of cross-functional collaboration.

Example Answer (Putting It All Together)

Question:

"Design a product to help remote workers stay productive."

Answer:

"Let’s focus on remote software engineers working for large companies. Their primary challenges include distractions at home, lack of structure, and communication overload. Our MVP will be a simple focus app with a Pomodoro timer that integrates directly with Slackdcs

How it works: The engineer sets a 25-minute focus session, during which Slack notifications are muted. If the user completes four sessions, they earn points that can be redeemed for small personal rewards (e.g., gift cards or virtual badges).

We’ll measure success using daily active users, session completion rates, and user satisfaction surveys.

Competitors like Toggl and Notion offer similar tools, but our product will stand out by focusing on habit-building through rewards and seamless Slack integration.

To launch the MVP, we’ll prioritize core features first. Future iterations could introduce task management or integrations with other collaboration tools like Trello. We’ll collaborate with designers, engineers, and legal teams to ensure smooth execution and compliance with privacy standards."

Ready to Take the Next Step?

If you found these insights helpful, let’s take it further,

• Land your dream job with personalized career coaching.

  Book 1:1 call

• Thrive in your current role by mastering career strategies and navigating challenges effectively.

• I have created a job portal that will give you access to High paying Best PM Jobs in the US - before they get flooded with applications - Visit BestPMJobs.com 

Let’s work together to get you the career and salary growth you deserve!

If you have any questions, reply to this email and I will be happy to help.

Wishing you a week filled with positive updates for your job.

I will see you next week.

All the Best

Aditi